Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland has reversed course on a challenge to Chuck Schumer for Senate majority leader. Days ago he said he was not interested — "I'm not seeking the Democratic leadership position," he said, explaining he was instead exploring a possible 2028 presidential run and telling an interviewer, "You can't do both." By Monday he was in what he calls active listening mode, and the door, he says, is not shut.
The shift came after a weekend of progressive pressure and Democratic flips in Texas, Ohio, Michigan and Maine. Pressed on whether he would consider a run against Schumer, Van Hollen answered: "I have said that I am in listening mode." Asked if he is open to it, he replied: "I haven't closed the door." A person familiar with his thinking describes him as in "active-listening mode," and Politico's Playbook put it the same way on Monday: "The door is not shut."
At a political conference on Saturday, Van Hollen set out the principle behind the shift: "Before we coronate any one person, the Democratic Senate caucus needs to have a discussion, including with the new members who were just elected." He has been telling interviewers the same thing in plainer words: "I'm listening now to the folks who are demanding change."
The pressure has names attached. Senator-elect Peggy Flanagan of Minnesota says she will not back Schumer, and Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed of Michigan has endorsed Van Hollen, calling him "amazing" as leader. Van Hollen's breakout moment with the party's base came in April 2025, when he travelled to a Salvadoran prison over a wrongly deported Maryland immigrant. Schumer, for his part, racked up Senate wins last Tuesday and would likely be tough to defeat.
For Democratic voters who just delivered those Senate flips, the question is whether the leader they get is chosen by the caucus after a real discussion — new members included — or settled in advance; Van Hollen's answer, for now, is that he is listening to the people demanding change.
At a post-election gathering in Washington on Saturday, Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen said there should be "no coronation" of Chuck Schumer as Senate majority leader, even after Democrats captured the Senate majority in Tuesday's midterms. "I've said very clearly that we need to have a discussion in the Democratic caucus, we need to understand what the Democrats are going to do with this new responsibility and these new powers, and nobody should get a blank check without a full understanding of the caucus as to where we're going to go," Van Hollen said. He has urged his Democratic colleagues to withhold commitments until Schumer outlines his vision.
Michigan's Elissa Slotkin, appearing at the same gathering, went further: she said Democrats should not give Schumer quorum — the minimum attendance required to conduct Senate business — until he answers their concerns. Arizona's Mark Kelly took the other side. "Chuck worked really hard to get this majority, so my plan is to support him," Kelly told reporters, while echoing the calls for Senate Democrats "to do things differently than we've done before."
Schumer remains the heavy favourite. He has no declared opposition and needs only majority support from a Democratic caucus whose ranks are poised to grow to at least 54 seats after Tuesday's elections. Several incoming freshmen have also vowed not to back him or withheld their support for now, and Scott Colom, the Democrat in Mississippi's still-uncalled Senate race, has been noncommittal too. In an interview with The New York Times published Friday, Schumer said he did not expect to face any opposition: "Our caucus is focused on moving forward. Everyone's very happy with what we all did."
The argument is about what Democrats will do with the power voters just handed them — and it carries 2028 overtones, since Van Hollen, Slotkin and Kelly are all spoken of as possible presidential candidates. For the voters who gave Democrats the Senate, who leads the chamber decides which bills reach the floor, so the outcome of this caucus fight will shape everything the new majority does.
— Previously posted on Saturday, November 7, 2026 —
Senator Elissa Slotkin of Michigan declined on Saturday to rule out challenging Chuck Schumer for Senate majority leader, telling an audience in Washington that Democrats need “a new generation of leadership” days after her party swept the midterm elections and took back both chambers of Congress.
Pressed at Crooked Con, an annual conference hosted by Crooked Media, on whether she would vote for Schumer or run against him, Slotkin said: “I’m not ruling anything out.” “I’ve been very vocal that we need a new generation of leadership. We couldn’t have gotten a clearer signal than Tuesday,” she said. She put the burden on Schumer: it is up to him to convince Democrats that he has a plan for wielding their new power — a plan for the first 100 days — and she said she would not vote for him if he cannot produce one.
Slotkin called the leadership question an “open field.” Votes are still being counted in Alaska and Mississippi, she noted, and conversations among the newly elected senators and the sophomore class are happening now — building what she called upward pressure for change. She made no announcement of her own. The host, Jon Lovett, noted that no woman has ever served as Senate majority leader.
Schumer, 75, has led Senate Democrats for almost a decade and has said he will be re-elected majority leader when the new Congress is seated in January. He needs only a simple majority of the Democratic caucus, projected at 54 to 56 members. But he is not an automatic choice this time: five newly elected Democratic senators have already said publicly that they will oppose him in the closed-door leadership vote, and other incoming senators are openly saying they are unsure he is the right leader for the party.
Slotkin, a former CIA analyst who served three tours in Iraq, was elected to the Senate in 2024 from a state President Trump carried, after six years in the House. She rose to national prominence in March 2025, when she delivered the Democratic response to the President’s address to Congress, arguing for bringing down prices for the middle class and securing the border while fixing the immigration system.
The majority leader’s job is the one that decides which bills ever reach the Senate floor — on prices, the border and everything else voters were promised on Tuesday. For ordinary Americans, this fight decides who will actually wield the power Democrats just won for the final two years of President Trump’s term, and whether the party that campaigned on change governs through its established leadership or hands the gavel to a new generation.
📰 ProfiloPolitics Member News — choose your news, share it, earn credit:
https://white-curlew-963569.hostingersite.com
Never miss a story — Join our Telegram channel
Breaking U.S. political news, live as it happens — plus the stories the big outlets sit on.
Join ProfiloPolitics on Telegram