President Trump has shut the door himself. In a Truth Social post on Thursday morning, he announced that he has asked Vice President JD Vance to focus his "complete and total attention on the Massive Corruption and Crime taking place in Democrat run Cities and States throughout the U.S." — and then he ruled out, in his own words, the Iran diplomacy his vice president was reported to be preparing: "CORRUPTION is in the Democrat Leadership's blood! We don't need a deal with Iran. Those days have long since passed. We've got their money, Hundreds of Billions of Dollars, and we've got their Strait!"
The post lands a day after the Wall Street Journal reported that Vance, empowered by Trump, was weighing a face-to-face meeting with Iran's security chief Mohsen Rezaei to end the war — reporting Tehran had already dismissed, with Rezaei calling the supposed talks "imaginary" and "pure lies." Trump's answer ends the ambiguity from the top: whatever was being weighed on Wednesday, the President's public position on Thursday is that America holds Iran's money and its strait and needs nothing from Tehran. The markets heard it — oil futures rose more than 1 percent after the post, with U.S. crude moving above $86 a barrel.
For American families, the two halves of the post point the same way. At home, the Vice President's time goes to the corruption-and-crime fight in Democrat-run cities and states — the taxpayer money Trump says is being stolen there. Abroad, his case is that the war has already delivered its leverage: Iran's billions in American hands and the Strait of Hormuz under American control, no concessions required. Whether a war without a deal can stay ended is the question his critics will press. Trump's stated answer is that America is negotiating from a position so strong it does not need to negotiate at all. The reporting this post answered is set out below.
— — —
Vice President JD Vance is considering a face-to-face meeting with Iran's top security official, Mohsen Rezaei, in a bid to end the war — and President Donald Trump has empowered Vance to lead the effort, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday, citing U.S. and Middle Eastern officials and people familiar with the negotiations. The discussions about a direct meeting are still preliminary: no date has been set, and the two sides are talking through mediators about next steps. A sitting U.S. vice president sitting down with Iran's security chief would be an extraordinary step — Rezaei, a former commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, is secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council and one of the hardest-line figures in Tehran's leadership.
The outreach did not start this week. Vance sent Rezaei a letter in October requesting a meeting — an approach the Journal first reported late last month, focused on a possible framework for talks rather than a detailed peace plan. According to a U.S. official, the letter put both countries' national interests at the centre and made Washington's bottom line plain: Iran must never obtain a nuclear weapon. Iranian news agencies confirmed at the time that Tehran had received the letter but had not responded. Since then Vance has taken a more active role in the Iran file than special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, who remain focused on the war in Ukraine — a natural fit, since it was Vance who led the negotiations that produced June's short-lived truce.
The diplomacy moved through Doha on Monday, when Qatar's prime minister, Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani — the central mediator between Washington and Tehran — met Vance at the White House and then sat down with Trump in the Oval Office. Doha has been floated as the venue if a Vance–Rezaei meeting happens, with Istanbul also named in earlier coverage. Trump said on Monday that he hoped for a deal — while noting that another U.S. aircraft carrier was moving into the region, a reminder that the military pressure stays on while the talking goes on.
Behind the push sits a disagreement inside Trump's own house. Officials told the Journal that Trump has privately criticised the June memorandum of understanding Vance helped negotiate, saying it gave Iran time to regroup before the United States imposed its blockade. A White House official rejected suggestions that Trump has had second thoughts, saying the negotiators acted in good faith. What is public is that Vance has blamed the war itself for Republicans' losses in the midterm elections — and now holds the file that will decide whether it ends.
Iran's price for resuming talks has not moved: the blockade must be lifted, frozen Iranian assets released and oil sanctions eased first. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has called those demands "totally unrealistic" — and at the G7 this week he went further, calling them outrageous and not realistic. Mediators have floated smaller confidence-building steps instead, including an American pullback of aircraft carriers and an easing of the port blockade in exchange for Iran allowing 25 tankers through the Strait of Hormuz.
Tehran's answer, delivered on Tuesday, was a flat denial that any of this is happening. "I emphasize that at the present moment, we are not conducting any negotiations with the Americans," Rezaei said in an interview with the Lebanese broadcaster Al Mayadeen, dismissing reports of a planned meeting with Vance as completely baseless and false — "imaginary talks." He accused Washington of manufacturing talk of negotiations for a shallow aim: easing economic pressure and bringing down international oil prices. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the same day that reports of a planned Rezaei–Vance meeting were baseless speculations. Rezaei said Iran has set seven conditions and is waiting for a clear American answer, and that the Strait of Hormuz will stay closed until Washington meets them. He has also ruled out removing Iran's enriched nuclear material from the country.
For ordinary Americans, what is at stake in this argument is the price of fuel and the risk of a wider war. The closed strait is the chokepoint for a large share of the world's oil, and every week it stays shut — or every new round of strikes — lands at the gas pump and in the price of everything shipped by sea. Rezaei's own accusation admits the flip side: even talk of negotiations moves oil prices down. A real channel between Vance and Tehran would be the first step toward ending a war American voters have already punished at the ballot box; Tehran insisting there is no channel at all means the blockade, the closed strait and the danger of renewed strikes all stay in place for now.
📰 ProfiloPolitics Member News — choose your news, share it, earn credit:
https://white-curlew-963569.hostingersite.com
Never miss a story — Join our Telegram channel
Breaking U.S. political news, live as it happens — plus the stories the big outlets sit on.
Join ProfiloPolitics on Telegram